Skip Navigation Links.

VHP Sterilization Process Validation

The validation of a vapor hydrogen peroxide (VHP) sterilization process involves verifying that the process consistently achieves the desired level of sterility assurance.

VHP Sterilization Process Validation VHP Sterilization Process Validation

Here are the general steps involved in VHP sterilization process validation:

  1. Define the Scope: Clearly define the scope of the validation, including the specific equipment, process parameters, and products or materials to be sterilized using VHP.
  2. Develop Validation Plan: Create a validation plan that outlines the objectives, approach, acceptance criteria, and test methods for the validation study. Consider relevant regulatory requirements and industry guidelines during the planning phase.
  3. Installation Qualification (IQ): Perform an IQ to ensure that the VHP sterilization equipment is correctly installed, calibrated, and meets the specified requirements. This may include verifying the functionality of equipment components, documenting equipment specifications, and ensuring proper installation and connections.
  4. Operational Qualification (OQ): Conduct an OQ to demonstrate that the VHP sterilization equipment operates within the defined parameters. This involves establishing and documenting the critical process parameters, such as temperature, humidity, VHP concentration, exposure time, and cycle duration. Test the equipment under normal operating conditions to confirm its performance and consistency.
  5. Performance Qualification (PQ): The PQ phase evaluates the sterilization process's effectiveness in achieving the desired level of sterility assurance. This is typically done by conducting a series of validation runs using biological indicators (BIs) or other suitable indicators. BIs are exposed to VHP sterilization cycles, and their subsequent growth or non-growth is assessed to determine the process efficacy. The number and placement of BIs should be representative of the most challenging locations within the sterilization chamber or load.
  6. Documentation and Analysis: Document all validation activities, including procedures, test results, and any deviations or corrective actions taken during the validation process. Analyze the data collected during the PQ phase to determine the process's capability and validate its effectiveness in achieving the desired sterility assurance level.
  7. Validation Report: Prepare a comprehensive validation report summarizing the entire validation process, including the scope, test methods, results, and conclusions. The report should also include any limitations or deviations encountered during the validation study.
  8. Ongoing Monitoring and Revalidation: Once the VHP sterilization process is validated, establish a routine monitoring and periodic revalidation program to ensure the process remains in a validated state. This may involve regular performance checks, routine process monitoring, periodic requalification, and review of validation data.

Determining the worst-case load for VHP sterilizer validation involves selecting the most challenging or difficult-to-sterilize items or materials that represent the maximum load for the sterilization process. The purpose of worst-case load selection is to ensure that the sterilization process can achieve the desired level of sterility assurance under the most challenging conditions. Here are some steps to determine the worst-case load for VHP sterilizer validation:

  1. Identify Critical Items: Identify the items or materials that are considered critical or challenging to sterilize due to their physical characteristics, complexity, or potential for harboring microorganisms. These may include items with intricate shapes, porous materials, or items with hard-to-reach areas.
  2. Consider Product Families or Batches: If your process involves sterilizing multiple products or batches with similar characteristics, select the most challenging product or batch from the group to represent the worst-case scenario. Consider factors such as size, shape, material composition, and potential for microbial contamination.
  3. Evaluate Load Density: Assess the load density, which refers to the arrangement and packing of items within the sterilizer chamber. A worst-case load may involve a high density of items that limit the penetration and distribution of VHP within the load.
  4. Consider Load Orientation: Evaluate the orientation of items within the sterilizer chamber. Items positioned in a way that restricts or hinders VHP exposure to critical areas may be considered for worst-case load selection.
  5. Perform Risk Assessment: Conduct a risk assessment to identify potential failure modes or areas of concern within the load. Consider factors such as load configuration, item placement, potential areas of low VHP concentration, and any other factors that may impact sterilization efficacy. Focus on items or load characteristics that have the highest risk of compromising the sterilization process.
  6. Document Rationalization: Clearly document the rationale behind the selection of the worst-case load, including the factors considered and the justifications for their significance. This documentation will provide a basis for the validation study and demonstrate the thought process behind load selection.